Encryption Examples for SQL Server. Keywords: Sip security, DoS, SQL injection, Vulnerabilities, sip nonce. Introducing nonces, hash functions Well it …
Tag: Cryptographic protocols
Errors testing new connector to CHv 8 – “Connection Error: A failure occurred connecting to Citrix Hypervisor. Error = write EPROTO 140247625111360:error:1407742E:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:tlsv1 alert protocol”
In the XenCenter configuration for the host, uncheck the option to force only TLS 1.2 communication. See the section, “disabling older protocols”, in the below doc.
https://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us/documents/white-paper/security-recommendations-when-deploying-citrix-xenserver.pdf
To correct the cert errors, when unchecking the connector setting, “ignore certificate errors”, follow the below article.
https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX261855
Related:
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software SSL VPN Denial of Service Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition that prevents the creation of new SSL/Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections to an affected device.
The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of Base64-encoded strings. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by opening many SSL VPN sessions to an affected device. The attacker would need to have valid user credentials on the affected device to exploit this vulnerability. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite a special system memory location, which will eventually result in memory allocation errors for new SSL/TLS sessions to the device, preventing successful establishment of these sessions. A reload of the device is required to recover from this condition. Established SSL/TLS connections to the device and SSL/TLS connections through the device are not affected.
Note: Although this vulnerability is in the SSL VPN feature, successful exploitation of this vulnerability would affect all new SSL/TLS sessions to the device, including management sessions.
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20191002-asa-ssl-vpn-dos
This advisory is part of the October 2019 Cisco ASA, FMC, and FTD Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication, which includes 10 Cisco Security Advisories that describe 18 vulnerabilities. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see Cisco Event Response: October 2019 Cisco ASA, FMC, and FTD Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication.
Security Impact Rating: High
CVE: CVE-2019-12677
Related:
August 2019’s Most Wanted Malware: Echobot Launches Widespread Attack Against IoT Devices
This month, SQL Injection techniques retain first place in the top exploited vulnerabilities list, closely followed by the OpenSSL TLS DTLS Heartbeat …
Related:
How can I disallow TLS 1.1 for the session between the user’s device and the Proxy SG?
I need a solution
Hi;
My understandins is that the TLS version setting under Configuraiton> SSL> SSL client are for the ssl session between the Proxy SG and the Server, so you can disallow TLS 1.1 between the Proxy SG and the OCS “Server”.
My question is:
How can I disallow TLS 1.1 for the session between the user’s device and the Proxy SG?
Kindly
Wasfi
0
Related:
What’s the traffic flow in case of an inline IPS and an inline Proxy SG?
I need a solution
Hi;
If I had an IPS device connected inline with the SSL V, and next inline of the SSL V is a Proxy SG.
Does the SSL “https” stream that arrives from the Internet, does it get decrypted by the SSLV to be sent to the IPS, which in case a clean traffic, returns it to the SSLV to be encrypted again and then re-decrypted to be sent to the Proxy SG, which in turn if the traffic is allowed, sends it back to the SSLV to be encrypted again and sent to the internal “LAN”?
Kindly
Wasfi
0
Related:
Cisco Webex Meetings Mobile (iOS) SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability
A vulnerability in Cisco Webex Meetings Mobile (iOS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized read access to sensitive data by using an invalid Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate.
The vulnerability is due to insufficient SSL certificate validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted SSL certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software.
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190821-webex-ssl-cert
Security Impact Rating: Medium
CVE: CVE-2019-1948
Related:
Why is policy coverage stats not showing an increase in the layer’s counter?
I need a solution
Hi;
In an SSL intercept layer, the policy coverage advanced stats is showing that a rule has been hit many times but there is no counter showing at the layer level. is there a reason for that?
Kindly
Wasfi
0
Related:
New flaw in IoT device affects nearly a third of organisations
The report said that last month’s most exploited vulnerabilities were SQL Injection, OpenSSL TLS DTLS Heartbeat Information Disclosure …
Related:
Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software File Policy Bypass Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)/Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol inspection engine of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured file policies on an affected system.
The vulnerability is due to errors when handling specific SSL/TLS messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets that would flow through an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured file policies and deliver a malicious payload to the protected network.
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
This advisory is available at the following link:
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190807-ftd-bypass
Security Impact Rating: Medium
CVE: CVE-2019-1970