Dell Technologies UK is committed to diversity and inclusion not only because it’s the right thing to do, but because its core to our business imperative. We embrace differences that drive innovative solutions for our customers and team members, making us a market leader. Focusing on our future To support our future innovators, we have an established partnership with the Prince’s Trust Foundation to empower disadvantaged young people across UK to get jobs. The Prince’s Trust Foundation has positively impacted over 870,000 disadvantaged youth to date. Embracing everyone’s individual talents Realising that everyone has unique strengths … READ MORE
|Update your feed preferences|
We have a group of developers that their code is being caught by the Reputation mechanism.
On the one hand, I dont want to disable the reputation detection but on the 2nd hand, I’d like them to be able to do their job.
What would be the best way to achieve that?
This [post] went into moderation. As a result, Bill asked “I know Stackoverflow allows users to post the full java exceptions from the stack trace…is this a bug in dwAnswers if the exception stack has repeating class names? I usually like to post the full exception so someone can see if there’s is exactly the same.” I think it’s good that Bill includes the trace but I do not think when the repeating phrase is part of trace that the post should go into moderation.
I looked in the [dW Answers FAQs] and I do not see any questions asking “What can cause a dW Answres post to go into moderation?” I think that would be a good addition because from a recent post it sounded like dW Answers posts could also go into moderation if they contain a lot of hyperlinks.