Tag: Alternative currencies

Blockchain Platforms Software Market Overview and Future Scope With Top Key Players – IBM …

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

This research report is equipped with the information categorising for Blockchain Platforms Software Market by parameters such as players, brands, regions, types and application. The report also details the information about the global market status, competition landscape, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, challenges, opportunities and porter’s forces analysis with respect to these elements.

Blockchain Platforms Software Market :- Reports Intellect represents the detail analysis of the parent market based on elite players, present, past and futuristic data which will offer as a profitable guide for all Blockchain Platforms Software Market competitors. The overall analysis Advanced Blockchain Platforms Software Market covers an overview of the industry policies that Blockchain Platforms Software Market significantly, the cost structure of the products available in the market, and their manufacturing chain.

You can get the sample copy of this report now @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/sample-request/733064

Key Companies Covered : IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS, OpenChain, Stellar, SAP, Amazon, Mastercard

Most Important Types : Private, Public, Consortium

Most Important Application : E-Commerce, Finance, Medicine, Real Estate, Others

Geographical Regions for Blockchain Platforms Software Market: Geographically, North America is largest market for Blockchain Platforms Software Market, followed by Europe, Asia Pacific, and Row. APAC region is expected to witness highest growth in forecast period. Rising R&D funding for development of microscopes, increasing nanotechnology research, low material costs, and growing expertise and academic excellence in emerging APAC countries such as China and India are the major factors driving the growth of this market.

Get Instant discount @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/discount-request/733064

Overview of the chapters analysing the Blockchain Platforms Software Market in detail

Chapter 1 details the information relating to Blockchain Platforms Software Market introduction, Scope of the product, market overview, Market risks, driving forces of the market, etc

Chapter 2 analyses the top manufacturers of the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market by sales, revenue etc for the period 2019 to 2024

Chapter 3 throws light on the competition landscape amongst the top manufacturers based on sales, revenue, market share etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapter 4 analyses the global market by regions and their market share, sales, revenue etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapters 5 to 9 analyse the key regions with key countries based on market share, revenue, sales etc.

Chapter 10 and 11 contain the information about market basis type and application, sales market share, growth rate etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapter 12 focuses on the market forecast for 2019 to 2024 for the Patient Derived Continuous for Blockchain Platforms Software Market by regions, type and application, sales and revenue.

Chapter 13 to 15 contain the details related to sales channels, distributors, traders, dealers, research findings, research findings, and conclusion etc for the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market.

Reasons why you should buy this report :

Understand the current and future of the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market in both developed and emerging markets.

The report assists in realigning the business strategies by highlighting the key business priorities.

The report throws light on the segment expected to dominate the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market

Forecasts the regions expected to witness fastest growth.

The latest developments in the Patient Derived for Blockchain Platforms Software Market and details of the market leaders along with their market share and strategies.

Saves time on the entry level research as the report contains vital information about growth, size, leading players and segments of the market.

The forecast assist in drafting expansion plans in business.

About Us:

Reports Intellect is your one-stop solution for everything related to market research and market intelligence. We understand the importance of market intelligence and its need in today’s competitive world.

Our professional team works hard to fetch the most authentic research reports backed with impeccable data figures which guarantee outstanding results every time for you.

So whether it is the latest report from the researchers or a custom requirement, our team is here to help you in the best possible way.

Contact Us:

sales@reportsintellect.com

PH – +1-706-996-2486

US Address:

225 Peachtree Street NE,

Suite 400,

Atlanta, GA 30303,

Related:

Blockchain Platforms Software Market Demand, Size, Trends, Development, Opportunity, Growth …

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

Blockchain Platforms Software Marketreport offers a comprehensive valuation of the marketplace. It does so via in-depth comprehensions, grateful market growth by pursuing past developments, and studying the present situation and future forecasts based on progressive and likely areas. Each research report supports as a depository of analysis and data for each and every side of the industry, including but not limited to: Regional markets, types, applications, technology developments and the competitive landscape.

Blockchain Platforms Software Market :- Reports Intellect represents the detail analysis of the parent market based on elite players, present, past and futuristic data which will offer as a profitable guide for all Blockchain Platforms Software Market competitors. The overall analysis Advanced Blockchain Platforms Software Market covers an overview of the industry policies that Blockchain Platforms Software Market significantly, the cost structure of the products available in the market, and their manufacturing chain.

Get Sample Copy of this Report at @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/sample-request/733064

The regional analysis of Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market is considered for the key regions such as Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, Latin America and Rest of the World. North America is the leading region across the world in terms of market share. Whereas, owing to rapid economic growth in countries such as China, India, and Japan, Asia Pacific region is also expected to exhibit higher growth rate / CAGR over the forecast period 2019-2024.

Some of the leading market players include : IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS, OpenChain, Stellar, SAP, Amazon, Mastercard

Market Segment by Type : Private,Public, Consortium

Market Segment by Applications : E-Commerce, Finance, Medicine., Real Estate, Others

Geographical Regions for Blockchain Platforms Software Market: Geographically, North America is largest market for Blockchain Platforms Software Market, followed by Europe, Asia Pacific, and Row. APAC region is expected to witness highest growth in forecast period. Rising R&D funding for development of microscopes, increasing nanotechnology research, low material costs, and growing expertise and academic excellence in emerging APAC countries such as China and India are the major factors driving the growth of this market.

Get Instant discount @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/discount-request/733064

Overview of the chapters analysing the Blockchain Platforms Software Market in detail

Chapter 1 details the information relating to Blockchain Platforms Software Market introduction, Scope of the product, market overview, Market risks, driving forces of the market, etc

Chapter 2 analyses the top manufacturers of the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market by sales, revenue etc for the period 2019 to 2024

Chapter 3 throws light on the competition landscape amongst the top manufacturers based on sales, revenue, market share etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapter 4 analyses the global market by regions and their market share, sales, revenue etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapters 5 to 9 analyse the key regions with key countries based on market share, revenue, sales etc.

Chapter 10 and 11 contain the information about market basis type and application, sales market share, growth rate etc for the period 2019 to 2024.

Chapter 12 focuses on the market forecast for 2019 to 2024 for the Patient Derived Continuous for Blockchain Platforms Software Market by regions, type and application, sales and revenue.

Chapter 13 to 15 contain the details related to sales channels, distributors, traders, dealers, research findings, research findings, and conclusion etc for the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market.

Reasons why you should buy this report :

Understand the current and future of the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market in both developed and emerging markets.

The report assists in realigning the business strategies by highlighting the key business priorities.

The report throws light on the segment expected to dominate the for Blockchain Platforms Software Market

Forecasts the regions expected to witness fastest growth.

The latest developments in the Patient Derived for Blockchain Platforms Software Market and details of the market leaders along with their market share and strategies.

Saves time on the entry level research as the report contains vital information about growth, size, leading players and segments of the market.

The forecast assist in drafting expansion plans in business.

About Us:

Reports Intellect is your one-stop solution for everything related to market research and market intelligence. We understand the importance of market intelligence and its need in today’s competitive world.

Our professional team works hard to fetch the most authentic research reports backed with impeccable data figures which guarantee outstanding results every time for you.

So whether it is the latest report from the researchers or a custom requirement, our team is here to help you in the best possible way.

Contact Us:

sales@reportsintellect.com

PH – +1-706-996-2486

US Address:

225 Peachtree Street NE,

Suite 400,

Atlanta, GA 30303

Related:

Korea: SK Telecom Launches Enterprise Blockchain Built on Hyperledger Frabic

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment
Reading Time: 2minutesbyEdoardo VecchioonJuly 26, 2019&nbspBlockchain

South Korean giant SK Telecom together with the members of its consortium, has launched an enterprise blockchain platform called STONledger. This according to news published by Business Korea on July 25, 2019.

STONLedger

SK Telecom, a South Korean telecommunications operator and one of the country’s largest chaebols, is entering into the blockchain realm with the launch of STONledger, an enterprise blockchain platform focused on identity verification and mobile commerce.

Specifically, one of the possible applications in development is a service that allows registering a driving license on the blockchain so as to reduce the number of frauds caused by unlicensed drivers. The venture was initially launched by the Korean government but subsequently, the development of the project was passed to a group of private companies, including SK Telecom.

One of the next milestones is to create a self-sovereign identity (SSI) wallet where users can upload their driving license and use it whenever they need it. For the uninitiated, self-sovereign identity (SSI) is a term used to describe the digital movement which recognizes that an individual owns and control their identity, without the intervening of administrative authorities. SSI allows people to interact in the digital world with the same freedom and capacity for trust as they do in the offline world.

STONledger’s main business model is based on a decentralized identifier (DID) that leverages blockchain technology to verify and identify an individual’s personal data, allowing them to have full access and control on information registered. Personal data is not limited to identity and can be expanded to any other information that needs to be recorded and not counterfeited, for example, college grades or school attendance. Apart from this, STONledger can be applied to other industries such as e-commerce, IoT, insurance, and payments.

Waiting Game

SK Telecom and other consortium members are waiting for government approval to officially launch the mobile driver’s license service, which had been applied for in May of 2019. Meanwhile, there are similar mobile authentication services such as T Authentication, KT Authentication and U+ Authentication that are currently available for users.

The goal is to combine those kinds of services, known under the tag “PASS”, with the decentralized identifier (DID) to create a mobile driver’s license which will be protected against fraud.

The approval is expected to be between mid-August and September at the 5th ICT Regulation Sandbox Review Committee.

Like BTCMANAGER? Send us a tip!
Our Bitcoin Address: 3AbQrAyRsdM5NX5BQh8qWYePEpGjCYLCy4

Related:

New York Times Plans Blockchain Project to Eliminate Fake News

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment
Reading Time: 2minutesbyAshwath BalakrishnanonJuly 24, 2019&nbspBlockchain

Today’s political climate is filled with different narratives and opinions, making it nothing short of confusing. The media believes they have had no role to play but are responsible for the elimination of this menace. By using the hyperledger fabric, NY Times seeks to build a proof of concept (PoC) to fight fake news, July 23, 2019.

Determining Sources and Origination

A key feature the PoC by the NY Times will bring is the ability to locate the origin of a picture or a piece of information.

Exploring a solution to solidify integrity in photojournalism is unheard of and would be s revolutionary development for reliability in the media.

Misinformation tools continue to evolve and many publications have taken an active role in educating the public. Recently, the Washington Post released a visual explainer of how video can be manipulated, and The Wall Street Journal set up a dedicated team to identify deepfakes.

Origination and source will help publications gain a more realistic view on the history for a picture. This, if successful, proves in theory that there is a way to identify the source for a photo.

Hyperledger is a permissioned blockchain, but other publications have been invited to work on the PoC along with NY Times.

The cryptocurrency industry in general is rife with misinformation. Rumors spread like wildfire and before you know it, somebody has twisted the core of the rumor and woven it into reality. It is a sad state of affairs, but this is not limited to cryptocurrencies.

Blockchain Promotes Integrity

A blockchain is a transparent, immutable ledger and is a database that radiates integrity at its core. Therefore, it is almost poetic to see it being used to battle the misinformation rampant in the media.

Distributed ledgers have been praised by corporations and governments alike. Their ability to keep every participant in the loop and not create unilateral disadvantages make them an ideal governance tool.

The merits of blockchain and distributed ledgers have never been disputed. Transparent and fair technology is not something governments cannot publicly shun – the key word being publicly.

Like BTCMANAGER? Send us a tip!
Our Bitcoin Address: 3AbQrAyRsdM5NX5BQh8qWYePEpGjCYLCy4

Related:

Blockchain Platforms Software Market to 2024: Growth Analysis by Manufacturers, Regions, Types …

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

Blockchain Platforms Software Market to 2024: Growth Analysis by Manufacturers, Regions, Types and Applications

The latest trending report Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market to 2024 available at MarketStudyReport.com is an informative study covering the market with detailed analysis. The report will assist reader with better understanding and decision making.

The research study on the Blockchain Platforms Software market projects this industry to garner substantial proceeds by the end of the projected duration, with a commendable growth rate liable to be registered over the estimated timeframe. Elucidating a pivotal overview of this business space, the report includes information pertaining to the remuneration presently held by this industry, in tandem with a meticulous illustration of the Blockchain Platforms Software market segmentation and the growth opportunities prevailing across this vertical.

Request a sample Report of Blockchain Platforms Software Market at: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2065864?utm_source=Intelligencejournal.com&utm_medium=AN

A brief run-through of the industry segmentation encompassed in the Blockchain Platforms Software market report:

Competitive landscape:

Companies involved: IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS, OpenChain, Stellar, SAP, Amazon and Mastercard

Vital pointers enumerated:

  • Sales area
  • Distribution
  • Company profile
  • Company overview
  • Products manufactured
  • Price patterns
  • Revenue procured
  • Gross margins
  • Product sales

The Blockchain Platforms Software market report provides an outline of the vendor landscape that includes companies such as IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS, OpenChain, Stellar, SAP, Amazon and Mastercard. Parameters such as the distribution and sales area, alongside other pivotal details such as the firm profiling and overview have also been mentioned.

The study mentions the products manufactured by these esteemed companies as well the product price prototypes, profit margins, valuation accrued, and product sales.

Ask for Discount on Blockchain Platforms Software Market Report at: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2065864?utm_source=Intelligencejournal.com&utm_medium=AN

Geographical landscape:

Regions involved: USA, Europe, Japan, China, India, South East Asia

Vital pointers enumerated:

  • Product consumption patterns
  • Valuation that each of these regions account for in the industry
  • Market share which every region holds
  • Consumption market share across the geographies
  • Product consumption growth rate
  • Geographical consumption rate

Segmented into USA, Europe, Japan, China, India, South East Asia, as per the regional spectrum, the Blockchain Platforms Software market apparently covers most of the pivotal geographies, claims the report, which compiles a highly comprehensive analysis of the geographical arena, including details about the product consumption patterns, revenue procured, as well as the market share that each zone holds.

The study presents details regrading the consumption market share and product consumption growth rate of the regions in question, in tandem with the geographical consumption rate with regards to the products and the applications.

Product landscape

Product types involved: Private and Public

Vital pointers enumerated:

  • Market share held by the product
  • Projected valuation of each type
  • Individual product consumption as per value and growth rate
  • Sales value

The Blockchain Platforms Software market report enumerates information with respect to every product type among IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS, OpenChain, Stellar, SAP, Amazon and Mastercard, elaborating on the market share accrued, projected remuneration of each type, and the consumption rate of each product.

Application landscape:

Application sectors involved: E-Commerce, Finance, Medicine, Real Estate and Others

Vital pointers enumerated:

  • Market share held by each application segment
  • Forecast valuation of each application
  • Consumption patterns

The Blockchain Platforms Software market report, with respect to the application spectrum, splits the industry into E-Commerce, Finance, Medicine, Real Estate and Others, while enumerating details regarding the market share held by each application and the projected value of every segment by the end of the forecast duration.

The Blockchain Platforms Software market report also includes substantial information about the driving forces impacting the commercialization landscape of the industry as well as the latest trends prevailing in the market. Also included in the study is a list of the challenges that this industry will portray over the forecast period.

Other parameters like the market concentration ratio, enumerated with reference to numerous concentration classes over the projected timeline, have been presented as well, in the report.

For More Details On this Report:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-blockchain-platforms-software-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2019-2024

Some of the Major Highlights of TOC covers:

Chapter 1: Methodology & Scope

Definition and forecast parameters

Methodology and forecast parameters

Data Sources


Chapter 2: Executive Summary

Business trends

Regional trends

Product trends

End-use trends


Chapter 3: Blockchain Platforms Software Industry Insights

Industry segmentation

Industry landscape

Vendor matrix

Technological and innovation landscape


Chapter 4: Blockchain Platforms Software Market, By Region

Chapter 5: Company Profile

Business Overview

Financial Data

Product Landscape

Strategic Outlook

SWOT Analysis

Related Reports:


1. Global IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO) Software Market Growth (Status and Outlook) 2019-2024

The IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO) Software Market Report offer the complete scenario of the industry and valuation of upcoming Trends for future market. It also gives the analytic of enduring growth factor, trends and statistic of IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO) Software Market industry. The IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO) Software Market has been outlined by overall information and analysis.

Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-it-resilience-orchestration-automation-itro-software-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2019-2024


2. Global IT Process Automation Software Market Growth (Status and Outlook) 2019-2024

IT Process Automation Software Market report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years, the Report also brief deals with the product life cycle, comparing it to the relevant products from across industries that had already been commercialized details the potential for various applications, discussing about recent product innovations and gives an overview on potential regional market.

Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-it-process-automation-software-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2019-2024

Read More Reports On: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/alcohol-testing-and-drug-testing-equipment-market-size-analysis-competitive-strategies-and-forecasts-to-2025-2019-07-04

Read More Reports On: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/signaling-devices-market-size-poised-to-touch-usd-26753-million-by-2025-2019-07-11

Contact Us:

Corporate Sales,

Market Study Report LLC

Phone: 1-302-273-0910

Toll Free: 1-866-764-2150

Email: [email protected]

Related:

Blockchain Platforms Software Market Forecast Benefits and Business Opportunities to 2024 by …

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

Blockchain Platforms Software Market research Report is a valuable supply of perceptive information for business strategists. This Blockchain Platforms Software Market study provides comprehensive data which enhances the understanding, scope and application of this report.

A thorough study of the competitive landscape of the global Blockchain Platforms Software Market has been given, presenting insights into the company profiles, financial status, recent developments, mergers and acquisitions, and the SWOT analysis. This research report will give a clear idea to readers about the overall market scenario to further decide on this market project.

The Blockchain Platforms Software Market report profiles the following companies, which includes: – IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Ethereum, Ripple, Quorum, Hyperledger, R3 Corda, EOS

Get Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/sample-request/733064

This report studies the global Blockchain Platforms Software Market status and forecast, categorizes the global Blockchain Platforms Software Market size (value & volume), revenue (Million USD), product price by manufacturers, type, application, and region. Blockchain Platforms Software Market Report by Material, Application, and Geography-Global Forecast to 2024 is an expert and far-reaching research provide details regarding the world’s major provincial economic situations, concentrating on the principle districts (North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific) and the fundamental nations (United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and China).

Market Segment by Type, covers

Private

Public

Consortium



Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into

E-Commerce

Finance

Medicine

Real Estate

Others

Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers

North America

Europe

Asia-Pacific

South America

Middle East and Africa

Table of Contents –

Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2024

1 Market Overview

2 Manufacturers Profiles

3 Global Blockchain Platforms Software Sales, Revenue, Market Share and Competition by Manufacturer

4 Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market Analysis by Regions

5 North America Blockchain Platforms Software by Countries

6 Europe Blockchain Platforms Software by Countries

7 Asia-Pacific Blockchain Platforms Software by Countries

8 South America Blockchain Platforms Software by Countries

9 Middle East and Africa Blockchain Platforms Software by Countries

10 Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market Segment by Type

11 Global Blockchain Platforms Software Market Segment by Application

12 Blockchain Platforms Software Market Forecast

13 Sales Channel, Distributors, Traders and Dealers

14 Research Findings and Conclusion

15 Appendix

Get a Good Amount of Discount @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/discount-request/733064

Overview of the chapters analysing the global Blockchain Platforms Software Market in detail:

  • Chapter 1 details the information relating to Blockchain Platforms Software introduction, Scope of the product, market overview, Market risks, driving forces of the market, etc
  • Chapter 2 analyses the top manufacturers of the Blockchain Platforms Software Market by sales, revenue etc for the Forecast period 2019 to 2024
  • Chapter 3 throws light on the competition landscape amongst the top manufacturers based on sales, revenue, market share etc for the period 2019 to 2024.
  • Chapter 4 analyses the global market by regions and their market share, sales, revenue etc for the period 2019 to 2024.
  • Chapters 5 to 9 analyse the Blockchain Platforms Software regions with Blockchain Platforms Software countries based on market share, revenue, sales etc.
  • Chapter 10 and 11 contain the information regarding market basis types and application, sales market share, growth rate etc for forecast period 2019 to 2024.
  • Chapter 12 focuses on the market forecast for 2019 to 2024 for the Blockchain Platforms Software Market by regions, type and application, sales and revenue.
  • Chapter 13 to 15 contain the details related to sales channels, distributors, traders, dealers, research findings, research findings, and conclusion etc for the Blockchain Platforms Software Market.

Reasons why you should buy this report

  • Understand the current and future of the Blockchain Platforms Software Market in both developed and emerging markets.
  • The report assists in realigning the business strategies by highlighting the Blockchain Platforms Software business priorities.
  • The report throws light on the segment expected to dominate the Blockchain Platforms Software industry and market.
  • Forecasts the regions expected to witness fastest growth.
  • The latest developments in the Blockchain Platforms Software industry and details of the industry leaders along with their market share and strategies.
  • Saves time on the entry level research as the report contains vital information about growth, size, leading players and segments of the industry.
  • Save and reduce time carrying out entry-level research by identifying the growth, size, leading players and segments in the global Market.

About Us:-

Reports Intellect is your one-stop solution for everything related to market research and market intelligence. We understand the importance of market intelligence and its need in today’s competitive world.

Our professional team works hard to fetch the most authentic research reports backed with impeccable data figures which guarantee outstanding results every time for you.

So, whether it is the latest report from the researchers or a custom requirement, our team is here to help you in the best possible way.

Contact Us:

Sales@reportsintellect.com

PH – + 1-706-996-2486

US Address:

225 Peachtree Street NE,

Suite 400,

Atlanta, GA 30303

Related:

Bitfury Draws Billion Dollar Businesses To The Bitcoin Blockchain – Here’s Why

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

Getty

Getty

Enterprises that leverage blockchain technology have become a defining characteristic of 2019. As Facebook continues to make headlines for its Libra blockchain project,fifty companies worth over a billion dollars are pioneering the current enterprise blockchain landscape.

Interestingly, over half the companies listed on theForbes 50 Enterprise Blockchain list are powered by Hyperledger, the open source collaborative effort hosted by the Linux Foundation. Yet while Hyperledger and Ethereum have become a standard for corporate blockchain projects, some enterprises are tapping into the Bitcoin blockchain to ensure unprecedented levels of trust, security and transparency.

Bitcoin: More Than A Cryptocurrency

While Bitcoin is best known for being a decentralized digital currency, the Bitfury Group recognized the potential in leveraging the Bitcoin blockchain when developing Exonum, their asset-management blockchain framework.

Leveraging the Bitcoin blockchain was one of the core things we were thinking about when developing Exonum three years ago,” Gleb Palienko, head of Exonum, told me. “We saw that there were different market demands at that time, yet there were not many platforms in place, aside from Ethereum and Hyperledger. We first developed an enterprise government platform that was permissioned. However, we understood that governments and enterprises wouldn’t want to use a public blockchain, but they would still want the benefits of one, such as data immutability.”

Understanding the potential that a public blockchain could bring to the enterprise in terms of security was a driving factor in the creation of Exonum.

“When designing Exonum, we wanted to ensure the immutability level of a public blockchain, and bitcoin is the most secure public blockchain out there,” explained Palienko.

Exonum was ultimately developed to guarantee the highest level of auditability of a permissioned blockchain, so that any user can verify information is actually stored on the blockchain, without relying on validators.

Unlike other private blockchains with validators, Exonum uses specific data structures like Merkle trees to store everything and enforce auditability. We also offer an anchoring service, which periodically stores a snapshot of the Exonum network to the Bitcoin blockchain. This prevents node maintainers’ collusion with incentive to rewrite historical data. Finally, we have developed a light client available in four programming languages that allows any business or government to build trusted client applications. The light client can verify the cryptographic proof by Exonum that transactions are really stored inside the blockchain,” said Palienko.

While the Exonum blockchain does have similarities to Ethereum (especially private installations) and Hyperledger (mainly IBM Fabric), the anchoring feature is what sets it apart from other enterprise blockchain frameworks.

We provide out of the box support of anchoring. Anchoring allows achieving immutability guarantees comparable to those of public blockchains, without disclosing any blockchain data. That’s how we leverage the Bitcoin blockchain. Exonum uses it as a globally accessible and ultimately secure and immutable storage, while providing more flexibility and understandable governance,” said Palienko.

The Bitcoin Blockchain For The Enterprise

Having proof that data is stored inside a blockchain framework without having full access to that data is showing to be valuable for a number of enterprises, specifically for governments and healthcare companies.

The entire reason we have a permissioned blockchain that anchors to Bitcoin is to give enterprises the best of both worlds. They aren’t putting everything out in the public, but still have the extra security of the public anchor, while having the ability to secure and look after their own data. This hybrid environment is much more attractive when you talk to enterprises,” Christopher Dickson, head of blockchain solutions at the Bitfury Group, told me.

For example, The Republic of Georgia is currently in talks with the Bitfury Group to help with time stamping for blockchain-based land registry titles. Since April 2016, The National Agency of The Public Registry (NAPR) has been collaborating with Bitfury to use blockchain technology to restore public trust in institutions and government agencies.

According to adetailed report, Bitfury created a blockchain-based timestamping layer on top of NAPR’s existing digital land registry system. This project has allowed land registry certificates to be timestamped and hashed on the bitcoin blockchain. In turn, this adds immutability and allows the owner of the document to prove to anyone that the receipt existed no later than the time of timestamping, and that it was authorized by NAPR.

At NAPR we have an electronic placement of shareholders rights and we want to ensure that all this data on the business registry will be timestamped and placed on the blockchain. There are disputes between shareholders when changes occur and we want to cover all timestamping instruments to avoid future disputes,” Elene Grigolia, land administration specialist at NAPR and blockchain legal consultant told me.

To guarantee this vision would be met, Bitfury has suggested that the Republic of Georgia use Exonum for timestamping due to the fact that it anchors data to the Bitcoin blockchain.

In the report, Bitfury explains that, “anchoring removes the need to trust the administrator(s) of an Exonum Blockchain unconditionally; at the same time, it keeps sensitive data private.” Exonum is still being tested in the Republic of Georgia as of September 2018.

In addition to government use cases, leveraging the Bitcoin blockchain has also proven to be useful for the trillion dollar global healthcare industry. For example, Nebula Genomics, a startup that operates a technology platform containing genome-sequencing data,uses the Exonum blockchain as a tamper proof device for medical record keeping.

We use Exonom to record consent of our study participants. For example, if a pharmaceutical company wants to access our anonymized genomic data, they can send a request through the blockchain, which ensures transparency and creates trust. We don’t store the patient data itself on the blockchain network, but the permissions are stored and recorded here. We then timestamp all of these permissions. If a company or researcher has permission to use the data, they collect it and store it on the cloud and can then access it, but the beauty is that everything has been documented on the Exonum blockchain,” Dennis Grishin, Chief Scientific Officer of Nebula Genomics, told me.

And Longenesis, a Riga, Latvia-based but Hong Kong-incorporated company, is also recording medical records on the blockchain. The company has a custom made Exonum blockchain data management solution for data transaction transparency and traceability, with a primary focus on medical-consent technologies.

Using Longenesis’s platform, a patient agrees to specified care or participation in a study. The patient can withdraw that agreement, while the medical provider can offer to extend, modify or amend the agreement.

According to the company, it will be providing its medical-consent platform-as-a-service to South Korea’s Hanshin Medipia Medical Center and Infinity Care.

We built on Exonum because as a private blockchain framework, it prioritizes security and trust. This is critical for the life data economics systems Longenesis is building for medical institutions around the world. Our Exonum blockchains enable us to trace virtually every transaction that happens with clinical data, as well as record patient consent, and enable compliant, transparent data sharing between pharmaceutical companies, research organizations and hospitals. We expect that this model will open up medical data to support new drug development, disease research and more.” Garri Zmudze, CEO of Longenesis, told me.

More Projects To Come

While Exonum’s users are primarily governments and large enterprises, Bitfury notes that many more projects are underway.

We have more than thirty in house projects being developed and a number of countries are looking to use Exonum, including the UK, Ukraine, China and The U.S. Rather than viewing blockchain platforms as ‘science projects,’ we are taking the approach that blockchain is necessary and can be integrated into other platforms. Additionally, we leverage the Bitcoin blockchain, which other players in the market could do, but that would go against their models. For us, this is our vision and this is what differentiates us,” said Dickson, head of blockchain solutions at the Bitfury Group.

Related:

Safety Without Silos: Why Businesses Will Learn to Love Public Ethereum

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

John Wolpert leads Web3Studio, a unit of ConsenSys. Before joining ConsenSys in 2017, he served as the global product executive for IBM Blockchain and co-founder of Hyperledger.

In 2015, the Ethereum public mainnet launched, followed by a raft of private blockchain offerings targeting the enterprise. This opened the floodgates on companies prioritizing collaboration, funding long-overdue digitization efforts, and extending business processes across corporate borders.

Today, a new epoch of system integration is underway. However, efforts to make blockchain technology enterprise-friendly split the community into two camps: public networks versus private networks. The dichotomy was wrong-headed from the start, making it easy to believe that public blockchain networks shouldn’t be used in confidential business operations and that private networks were safe and secure.

The first belief is wrong, and the second is dangerous.

It’s true that the consensus mechanism of a private blockchain can make it difficult to tamper with information, assuming that the companies maintaining the ledger don’t share a common motive to alter records. But such private blockchain networks are not particularly secure against data breaches, because they must protect many identical copies, each controlled by a different company. That’s a hacker’s dream. This can be managed, and the risk can be worth it, but to say that private blockchains are secure is specious.

Hacking notwithstanding, not everyone in a consortium should know about every transaction or agreement between others operating in that network, even among a tight group of permissioned partners. Private platforms like Hyperledger Fabric try to compartmentalize information inside a permissioned network, but it’s not what blockchain technology was designed to do.

Consequently, they add an immense amount of complexity, and complexity is the enemy of security. The good news is that there is a way to use blockchain technology that reduces system integration complexity, increases security, and improves both resilience and interoperability. And this approach doesn’t require companies to replace internal systems or build “consortium blockchains” that recreate the same old information silos that already plague the business.

Enterprise blockchain must face the following conundrum: on the one hand, we want information transparency across business networks to improve outcomes like food safety and reduce fraud, but on the other hand, we need compartmentalization of information to ensure privacy and encourage companies to participate.

A Common Challenge

This puzzle appears in every kind of business. Advertising. Finance. Manufacturing.

Consider a case from the automotive industry. Say a car part fails and causes a crash. It turns out that the part was made by a machine that happened to malfunction during only one production run. The run made just 50 parts, twenty of which were sent to the maker of the crashed car and the remainder to another car company. It would be great if the investigator of the crash could instantly access the data from the machine that made the parts, know the information had not been altered, and trace the 50 bad parts to each installed car.

That’s a 50-car recall, not a million-car recall. But there’s a problem. The parts manufacturer will not put its internal machine telemetry in a database controlled or viewable by anyone else, certainly not one accessible to competitors. And even if one car maker set up a database and convinced suppliers to use it, the other car maker wouldn’t use it.

A third party that everyone trusts to store their data, manage workflows, and compartmentalize information could handle this scenario. The problem is that it gives someone a lot of power to soak the firms for fees. And inevitably more than one such provider pops up, usually generating incompatible factions that foil standardization.

We could put the whole thing on a blockchain, but then everyone would see all the data, or at least everyone would be executing the code that embodies business agreements between the different companies. And that can give away sensitive strategies, tactics and relationships to other network participants to exploit, even if the information itself is encrypted.

In the end, what makes sense is letting each party manage their own private systems with their own private data, running their own protected functions – but integrating them in such a way that allows them to coordinate where appropriate, quickly track down problems, and ensure everyone is playing by the rules.

To integrate different systems this way requires a common frame of reference. We need a way to pass messages between functions running on separate systems, so that they can work together without having to expose the underlying data or business logic indiscriminately. Using a common frame of reference isn’t a new idea. Publishing messages to a common bulletin board, a magic message bus, is a classic pattern for making system integration more manageable and resilient.

You can buy expensive middleware to do the job right now. And you can pay a system integrator a king’s ransom every time you need to connect one company or department to another with it.

What’s new is the notion of using the Ethereum mainnet as a global integration hub serving systems that work together without revealing private data or confidential business logic, even to partners. One might be tempted to use a private blockchain network for this. But as Paul Brody, global leader of blockchain for Ernst & Young, explains, this is a bad idea for real business:

“One day you get a call from a very large buyer saying, ‘Would you like to join my private blockchain?’ You say, ‘Okay.’ And then you get the same call from your wholesaler, your suppliers, your shipper, your insurance company and maybe even your bank…or several of each of these! Suddenly you are spending all your time – and a lot of money – juggling dozens of blockchains. When the next partner calls, you say, ‘Just fax me the order.’”

Brody asserts that this is why the enterprise blockchain consortium approach doesn’t scale organizationally, and his argument makes a lot of sense. It looks like the same siloed mess we’ve lived with for decades.

But by using a mainnet like Ethereum 2.0, we will be able to treat business integrations more like workgroups and channels on Slack: easy to create, combine and recombine. Your SAP inventory management system, your supplier’s JD Edwards ERP system, and your fancy fintech partner’s blockchain thingamajig can work together in a consistent, repeatable manner without having to set up new infrastructure to accommodate each set of partners.

Who’s Working on It

Venerable firms like Microsoft and Ernst & Young, and projects like Chainlink and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance’s Trusted Compute working group, are already ahead of this.

The recently released Trusted Compute specification will, for example, allow an automobile safety inspector to query a parts manufacturer, spot a problem with a production run, and be confident the answer is based on authentic information generated by systems free from tampering – without forcing the company to expose their internal data.

The Nightfall project, developed by Ernst & Young, uses the mainnet to post cryptographic proofs for system integration and compliance. The fact that a 150-year-old accounting firm like EY is using the public mainnet this way speaks volumes. And it puts the lie to the notion that you can’t use the mainnet in business. What company could be more cautious about managing private, confidential information than one of the Big Four accounting firms?

In 2015, the enterprise had no real interest in blockchain. Then suddenly, it decided to use private versions of it for jobs that often were a better fit for traditional systems. Now, with the benefit of almost five years of experience, smart businesses are discovering that the real job is putting an end to a half-century of brittle, balkanized and bespoke system integration.

And the right tool for that job is the mainnet.

Barrier breaking via Shutterstock

Related:

RWaltz Software- Company Overview | Blockchain Application Development Company in USA India

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

RWaltz Software is one of the Top Blockchain Application Development Company in the USA, India which offers complete blockchain technology solutions including Ethereum, ICO Development, Smart Contracts, Decentralized Applications (DApps), Hyperledger, Private Blockchain Development Services, Cryptocurrency Wallet, Bitcoin Apps, etc. We also offer AI/ML, Big Data & Hadoop, Data Science, ERP and more so that our two main goals would be satisfied, which are, Bring Leading Edge and Trusted Technologies to Benefit the Clients and Fulfill the Exact Need of a Client On-Budget and On-Time.

Paras Kale

Paras Kale

Paras Kale is the Director of Rwaltz Software Company, which is into AI/ML, Blockchain-related products and development work. Blockchain enthusiast. Expertise in the area of Blockchain and web technologies. Experience in Smart Contract.

Get email notifications on {{subject}} daily!

Your notification has been saved.
There was a problem saving your notification.

{{description}}

Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.

Followed notifications

Please log in to use this feature

Log In

Don’t have an account?Sign Up Today

Related:

Blockchain in Supply Chain Market Report 2019: Significant Trends and Factors Driving the Market …

PCIS Support Team Leave a comment

Market Stats Report Announces another top to bottom industry research that spotlights on Blockchain in Supply Chain Market, conveys itemized examination of the market and future prospects of Blockchain in Supply Chain Market. The critical and significant data in the study makes the research a very important tool for experts, analysts and managers to get ready-to-access analysis by the industry professionals. The examination is connected with considerable data as diagrams and tables to comprehend vital market patterns, drivers, and difficulties.

Download sample report at https://marketstatsreport.com/global-blockchain-in-supply-chain-market-share-analysis/#REPORT-DESCRIPTION

The research also covers the current market size of the Blockchain in Supply Chainalong with the growth rate over the years. The Blockchain market ecosystem comprises vendors, such as Abra, AlphaPoin, Bitfury Group Limited, Bloq, BTL Group Ltd, Coinbase, Digital Asset Holding LLC, Ethereum Foundation, Guardtime, Internation Machine Business Corporation, IBM, Blockcypher, Inc., Microsoft, Primechain Technologies Pvt. Ltd, Skuchain, Romit and Provenance Ltd, among others.

The inside and out data by different portions of Blockchain in Supply Chainadvertise empowers administrators to screen future productivity and settle on essential choices for supportable development.

Geographically, this report is subdivided into several key regions, with data concerned to the revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Blockchain in Supply Chain Market in these regions, for 6 years from 2018 to 2025 (forecast), covering and its Share (%) and CAGR for the forecasted period 2018 to 2025.

Blockchain in Supply Chain Market Segmentation:

Based on type of industry, the market is segmented into private, public and consortiums; based on the application of the industry, the market is categorized into contract management, payment system, procurement, provenance, ownership transfer, asset tracking and inventory control. Moreover based on the protocols of the industry it is divided into bitcoin, ethereum, ripple consensus network, hyperledger, R3’s corda, symbiont, distributed ledgers and others.

The segmentation is also based on the types of industries involved and the market is categorized into banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI), telecom and IT, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, retail, e-commerce and others.

Blockchain in Supply Chain Market by Region:

  • North America
    • S.
    • Mexico
    • Canada
  • Europe
    • UK
    • France
    • Germany
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
  • Latin America
    • Brazil
  • The Middle East and Africa

Thank you for looking into this article; you can also get Customization of the Report chapter wise or Geographic Region wise.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Executive summary

1.1. Market scope and segmentation

1.2. Key questions answered in this study

1.3. Executive summary

Chapter 2: Global Blockchain in Supply Chain Market – market overview

2.1. Global market overview – market trends, market attractiveness analysis, geography-wise market revenue (USD)

2.2. Global – market drivers and challenges

2.3. Value chain analysis – Blockchain in Supply Chain Market

2.4. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

2.5. Market segmentation on the basis of type (private, public and consortium)

2.5. a. Revenue from private Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.5. b. Revenue from public Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.5. c. Revenue from consortium Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. Market segmentation on the basis of application (contract management, payment system, procurement, provenance, ownership transfer, asset tracking and inventory control)

2.6. a. Revenue from contract management – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. b. Revenue from payment system – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. c. Revenue from procurement – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. d. Revenue from provenance – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. e. Revenue from ownership transfer – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. f. Revenue from asset tracking – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.6. g. Revenue from inventory control – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. Market segmentation on the basis of protocol (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple Consensus Network, Hyperledger, R3’s Corda, Symbiont, Distributed ledgers and others)

2.7. a. Revenue from Bitcoin – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. b. Revenue from Ethereum – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. c. Revenue from Ripple Consensus Network – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. d. Revenue from Hyperledger – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. e. Revenue from R3’s corda – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. f. Revenue from Symbiont – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. g. Revenue from Distributed ledgers – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.7. h. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. Market segmentation on the basis of industries involved (Banking, Financial services and Insurance (BFSI), Telecom and IT, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, retail, e-commerce and others)

2.8. a. Revenue from banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI) – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. b. Revenue from telecom and IT – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. c. Revenue from healthcare and life sciences – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. d. Revenue from manufacturing – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. e. Revenue from retail – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. f. Revenue from e-commerce – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

2.8. g. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

Chapter 3: North America Blockchain in Supply Chain Market- market overview

3.1. Market overview-market trends, market attractiveness analysis, geography wise market revenue (USD)

3.2. North America – market drivers and challenges

3.3. Market segmentation on the basis of type (private, public and consortium)

3.3. a. Revenue from private Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.3. b. Revenue from public Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.3. c. Revenue from consortium Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. Market segmentation on the basis of application (contract management, payment system, procurement, provenance, ownership transfer, asset tracking and inventory control)

3.4. a. Revenue from contract management – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. b. Revenue from payment system – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. c. Revenue from procurement – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. d. Revenue from provenance – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. e. Revenue from ownership transfer – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. f. Revenue from asset tracking – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.4. g. Revenue from inventory control – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. Market segmentation on the basis of protocol (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple Consensus Network, Hyperledger, R3’s Corda, Symbiont, Distributed ledgers and others)

3.5. a. Revenue from Bitcoin – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. b. Revenue from Ethereum – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. c. Revenue from Ripple Consensus Network – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. d. Revenue from Hyperledger – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. e. Revenue from R3’s Corda – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. f. Revenue from Symbiont – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. g. Revenue from Distributed ledgers – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.5. h. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. Market segmentation on the basis of industries involved (Banking, Financial services and Insurance (BFSI), Telecom and IT, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, retail, e-commerce and others)

3.6. a. Revenue from banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI)- Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. b. Revenue from telecom and IT – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. c. Revenue from healthcare and life sciences – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. d. Revenue from manufacturing – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. e. Revenue from retail – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. f. Revenue from e-commerce – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

3.6. g. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

Chapter 4: Europe Blockchain in Supply Chain Market – market overview

4.1. Market overview-market trends, market attractiveness analysis, geography wise market revenue (USD)

4.2. Europe – market drivers and challenges

4.3. Market segmentation on the basis of type (private, public and consortium)

4.3. a. Revenue from private Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.3. b. Revenue from public Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.3. c. Revenue from consortium Blockchain – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. Market segmentation on the basis of application (contract management, payment system, procurement, provenance, ownership transfer, asset tracking and inventory control)

4.4. a. Revenue from contract management – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. b. Revenue from payment system – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. c. Revenue from procurement – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. d. Revenue from provenance – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. e. Revenue from ownership transfer – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. f. Revenue from asset tracking – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.4. g. Revenue from inventory control – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. Market segmentation on the basis of protocol (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple Consensus Network, Hyperledger, R3’s Corda, Symbiont, Distributed ledgers and others)

4.5. a. Revenue from Bitcoin – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. b. Revenue from Ethereum – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. c. Revenue from Ripple Consensus Network – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. d. Revenue from Hyperledger – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. e. Revenue from R3’s Corda – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. f. Revenue from Symbiont – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. g. Revenue from Distributed ledgers – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.5. h. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. Market segmentation on the basis of industries involved (Banking, Financial services and Insurance (BFSI),Telecom and IT, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, retail, e-commerce and others)

4.6. a. Revenue from banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI)- Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. b. Revenue from telecom and IT – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. c. Revenue from healthcare and life sciences – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. d. Revenue from manufacturing – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. e. Revenue from retail – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. f. Revenue from e-commerce – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

4.6. g. Revenue from others – Historical (2015-2017) and forecasted (2018-2023) market size (USD Bn), key observations

TOC Continued…

Key Benefits for Global Blockchain in Supply Chain Market Reports

  • Global market report covers in-depth historical and forecast analysis.
  • Global market research report provides detail information about Market Introduction, Market Summary, Global market Revenue (Revenue USD), Market Drivers, Market Restraints, Market Opportunities, Competitive Analysis, Regional and Country Level.
  • Global market report helps to identify opportunities in market place.
  • Global market report covers extensive analysis of emerging trends and competitive landscape.

This comprehensive report will provide:

  • Enhance your strategic decision making
  • Assist with your research, presentations and business plans
  • Show which emerging market opportunities to focus on
  • Increase your industry knowledge
  • Keep you up-to-date with crucial market developments
  • Allow you to develop informed growth strategies
  • Build your technical insight
  • Illustrate trends to exploit
  • Strengthen your analysis of competitors
  • Provide risk analysis, helping you avoid the pitfalls other companies could make
  • Ultimately, help you to maximize profitability for your company.

Our Market Research Solution Provides You Answer to Below Mentioned Question:

  • Which are the driving factors responsible for the growth of this market?
  • Which are the roadblock factors for this market?
  • What are the new opportunities responsible for the growth in the coming years?
  • What are the present and future trends in this market?
  • Which are the main factors responsible for a new product launch?
  • How big is the global & regional market in terms of revenue, sales and production?
  • How far will the market grow in forecast period in terms of revenue, sales, and production?
  • Which region is dominating the global market and what are the market shares of each region in the overall market in 2017?
  • How will each segment grow over the forecast period and how much revenue will these segments account for, in 2024?
  • Which region has more growth opportunities?

Related: